Questions and Answers

0 Like 0 Dislike

Jaeseong Bae

GEBT: fail to analyze an isotropic cantilever beam with tip bending moment

Hello,

I am using GEBT to analyze an isotropic cantilever beam subject to a tip bending moment, a well-known problem in the geometrically nonlinear analysis of beams.

The analysis conditions of the beam are given as follows.

- Cross-section: width (b) = 0.1in., height (h) = 0.01in.

- Beam length (L) = 10in.

- Young's modulus (E) = 1x107psi

- Poisson's ratio (nu) = 0.3

- Reference frame : Global frame (a1: axial direction, a2: lag direction, a3: flap direction)

- Tip bending moment: n x 2 x pi x EI_2 / L (The moment is acting about a2 axis, n is the loadfactor, EI_2 = b*h^3/12)

- Shear flexiblities are suppressed to be zeros for the analysis under Euler-Bernoulli level.

 

As already known, the beam should form a circle when n = 1. However, GEBT fails to find converged solution under that loadfactor.

For your information, I have posted my input file for this problem as follows.

 

0 10000 100 # analysis_flag, niter, nstep

2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 # nkp, nmemb, ncond_pt, nmate, nframe, ncond_mb, ndistrfun, ntimefun, ncurv

1  0 0 0
2 10 0 0

1 1 2 1 1 0 10 0 # memb_no, kp1, kp2, mate1, mate2, frame_no, nelem, curv_no

1
1 2 3 4 5 6
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0

2
7 8 9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 5.23598776E-02 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0

1
1.00000000E-04    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00
0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00
0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00
0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    7.80000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00
0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    1.20000000E+01    0.00000000E+00
0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    0.00000000E+00    1.20000000E-01

 

It would be grateful if someone leave me a reply.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Jaeseong

 

Report abuse

2 Responses

  1. 0 Dislike

    Wenbin Yu

    Please ask this type of questions at https://cdmhub.org/groups/yugroup/forum instead to get a quick answer. Thanks a lot!

    Reply Report abuse

    Please login to answer the question.

    1. 0 Like 0 Dislike

      Jaeseong Bae

      Thanks at lot for the reply. Do I need to get a membership to post this question in that page?

      Cancel Report abuse

      Please login to answer the question.

      1. 0 Like 0 Dislike

        Wenbin Yu

        Yes. You just request it. It is free.

        Report abuse

  2. 0 Like 0 Dislike

    Qi Wang

    Hi Jaeseong,

    GEBT uses vector parameterization for rotations. There will be a singular point by using this kind of rotation representation, usually at pi (180 degree) or 2pi (360 degree). For GEBT, the singular point is at 2pi, that's the reason your case failed to form a circle. You may try load factor 0.9, 0.98 etc so that you can see it is very close to a full circle. More details can be found in this paper:

    https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4985091

    Qi

    Reply Report abuse

    Please login to answer the question.