A Unified Theory for Constitutive Modeling of Composites
You must login to access the full resource.
Licensed under
Dear All, there are two channels for you to follow our research.
1. We started a newsletter called Thoughts on Composites Modeling on LinkedIn. Please subscribe to it to get informed about our research and ideas we want to share with the community.
2. We moved our discussion forum to github at wenbinyugroup · Discussions · GitHub as it has more features which can serve you better.
Wenbin
You must login to access the full resource.
Licensed under
A unified theory for multiscale constitutive modeling of composites is developed using the concept of structure genomes. Generalized from the concept of the representative volume element, a structure genome is defined as the smallest mathematical building block of a structure. Structure genome mechanics governs the necessary information to bridge the microstructure length scale of composites and the macroscopic length scale of structural analysis and provides a unified theory to construct constitutive models for structures including three-dimensional structures, beams, plates, and shells over multiple length scales. For illustration, this paper is restricted to construct the Euler–Bernoulli beam model, the Kirchhoff–Love plate/shell model, and the Cauchy continuum model for structures made of linear elastic materials. Geometrical nonlinearity is systematically captured for beams, plates/shells, and Cauchy continuum using a unified formulation. A general-purpose computer code called SwiftComp (accessible at https://cdmhub.org/resources/scstandard) implements this unified theory and is used in a few example cases to demonstrate its application.
This is a significant revised version of the conference paper at https://cdmhub.org/resources/605 published in Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, please cite this paper as: Yu, W.: "A Unified Theory for Constitutive Modeling of Composites," Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, vol. 11, no. 4, 2016, pp. 379-411.
Researchers should cite this work as follows: