Dear All, there are two channels for you to follow our research.
1. We started a newsletter called Thoughts on Composites Modeling on LinkedIn. Please subscribe to it to get informed about our research and ideas we want to share with the community.
2. We moved our discussion forum to github at wenbinyugroup · Discussions · GitHub as it has more features which can serve you better.
Wenbin
Su Tian @ on
PreVABS 1.4.3 is now available at cdmHUB - The Composites HUB - Resources: PreVABS: About.
(For VABS 4.0 and SwiftComp 2.1)
Changes of this update:
Reply Report abuse
Kevin Wang @ on
Thanks Su!
Can you confirm what results we should be seeing with the example file ex_uh60a_f?
I'm getting a max failure index of 1.1276066E+009 and a min strength ratio of 2.9779760E-005 at element 14081.
Reply Report abuse
Su Tian @ on
Kevin,
There was a small issue in the code. I have fixed it. Please download and try it again. Thank you.
Report abuse
Kevin Wang @ on
Hey Su,
Thanks! I downloaded the latest version and gave it a try
-d -e -v first, results look reasonable
-fi -e -v second, .fi file looks reasonable. Min strength ratio of 0.814 @ element 18252 with a corresponding failure index of 1.492
Visualization of the strength ratio looks correct, however the failure index looks similar to what Dana saw below. The .fi file has all the failure indices populated for each element, so looks to purely be a plotting error?
Let me know if you run into the same issue
Report abuse
Su Tian @ on
Kevin,
Yes. This is just a plot setting issue. I just fixed it. You can download and try it again.
Report abuse
Kevin Wang @ on
Awesome, looks like that fixed it!
Thanks
Report abuse
Wenbin Yu @ on
Looks unrealistic to me. Su, you might want to create a more realistic example instead.
Cancel Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
Hey Su,
Thanks for all the help here. I had a couple questions. I downloaded prevabs 1.4.3 after your message above to re-download. I ran the uh60a example, first prevabs –i uh60a.xml -h -e -v, then prevabs –i uh60a.xml -d -fi -e -v.
For the second dehomogenization / failure index run, all the stress and strain plots, both material and global, as well as the failure index plot, appear blank (see figure).
Note that the strength ratio plot is not blank, and looks more reasonable (fringe scale from 0.814 to 8.14).
Thanks,
Dana
Reply Report abuse
Su Tian @ on
Dana,
At this moment, the code does not support calling '-d' and '-fi' using a single command. You need to run them separately. This feature may require updates from both VABS and PreVABS in the future.
Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
Hey ya'll,
So I just downloaded the latest version, and even when running '-d' and '-fi' seperately, I am still seeing blank plots for stress, strain, displacement, and failure index. I do see the strength ratio plot. Any ideas? I see the latest version solved the problem for Kevin.
Reply Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
Here's what I mean by blank plots
Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
2nd blank plot
Report abuse
Kevin Wang @ on — Edited @ @ on
If you open your .msh file, does it populate with numbers? I've uploaded mine if you wanted to do a quick comparison
Edit: sorry it looks like the file wasn't part of the approved extensions. I've zipped it to circumvent the rule
uh60a-local-case-1.zip
5 MBClick to download
Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
Hmm yeah something odd is going on. When I open your .msh file, it also comes in blank. Do you mind uploading a screenshot of what you see in gmsh?
Reply Report abuse
Kevin Wang @ on
Sorry this fell off my radar. Attached is what I see.
Report abuse
Dana Frye @ on
Thanks Kevin, much appreciated. I got it sorted with Su's help, it was a plotting setting that was stored on my PC for gmsh that was the cause.
Report abuse